Maternity services
Our hospitals provide maternity care for more than 8,000 women every year
Every year thousands of women give birth in our hospitals and community, and we want each and every one of those women to receive excellent care and have a positive experience with us. In the majority of cases this is happening, but not always and we know that isn’t good enough.
We are committed to making improvements to your maternity services and that is reflected in our latest report from the independent regulator of healthcare in England, the Care Quality Commission (CQC). In September 2023, the CQC looked at maternity services at Queen’s Medical Centre and Nottingham City Hospital and increased the rating at both sites from inadequate to requires improvement.
We continue to work hard to make the necessary and sustainable improvements to our maternity services for our communities and also for our staff. Below is a timeline of the work we have done so far. Please note - this is just a snapshot and is not an extensive list.
Chief Executive’s Office
Trust Headquarters
City Hospital campus
Hucknall Road
Nottingham
NG5 1PB
Dear Donna,
Thank you for your letter of 1 July 2024. As always, I am grateful to you for providing feedback to support our ongoing perinatal improvement journey. I am grateful, also, for the open and transparent way in which you are conducting your review. I believe this approach will benefit all those affected by the review, particularly women and families. Please accept my assurance that we will continue to learn from your feedback and incorporate it into our Maternity Improvement Programme.
I want to acknowledge the concerns being expressed by both women and families, and colleagues who work in Maternity Services. It is important that we address the feedback you have received. I hope you will be reassured by the range of actions, set out in this letter, which we are taking to improve the quality of our maternity services. I know we have a long way to go, but we are committed to your review as a key part of our improvement.
As part of our commitment to supporting your review, and the requirement to address the concerns of families, we have invested in a team to review the cases you have referred to the Trust. Recruitment is largely complete, and I anticipate this will lead to an improvement in our responsiveness. This investment will remain in place for the duration of the Independent Maternity Review (IMR). In addition we are working on a stronger approach to family liaison, which I plan to present at the Trust’s Annual Public Meeting on 18 September 2024.
I will address the remainder of your concerns following the thematic approach you have used. In so doing there may be a degree of overlap between the sections.
Governance
Improving our responses to Subject Access Requests (SAR) and complaints is a priority for the Trust. We have made a number of improvements, but there is still more to do. We have restructured the team which deals with SARs, Freedom of Information requests and access to medical records. In July 2024, 14 new colleagues were appointed and will commence throughout August and September 2024, with more posts in the process of recruitment. This should move the service into a period of stability over the next three to six months. In the meantime, to bridge the gap, we have offered existing staff overtime and reviewed business processes.
A new IT system (Core-Stream) was implemented in January 2024 which ensures the streamlining of requests. There has already been a considerable improvement on outstanding cases. This should continue to improve, although it will take some months to catch up on the Trust’s significant backlog.
In addition, we are working hard to improve our response to complaints. Overall, our complaint response rate has improved this year, and by increasing staffing in this area we are focussed on maintaining that trajectory. The challenge in relation to quality is accepted and recognised. Our new Chief Nurse is looking at this as a priority.
The process for requesting access to health records is also under review, although the provision of the minimum personal information is a requirement of the Data Protection Act. Nevertheless, our Chief Digital and Information Officer is charged with revisiting how the system is navigated and the guidance notes. We are committed to simplifying the process and improving the supporting information.
The use of inappropriate language in emails is entirely unacceptable and I apologise unreservedly to anyone who has been affected. Potentially, inappropriate language and exchanges in emails is a disciplinary matter. Any specific examples will be properly dealt with in line with our HR professional standards arrangements. To tackle this issue, I have taken the following actions:
Follow-up of cases referred to the Trust
I am committed to ensuring that we take every possible step to satisfactorily address all concerns raised with us. That said, I am mindful that some families have indicated to the Trust that they do not wish to pursue a matter further. If these, or any other family, would prefer us to communicate through your office, we would be happy to do so, provided we have their consent. This arrangement might apply, also, where a family may not regard a matter as “closed”, and indicate as much to your team. In these instances, I hope we can work together to find an acceptable form of closure recognising that a family might prefer to receive responses via you rather than directly from the Trust.
I can confirm that (at the time of writing) backlog in birth debriefs has reduced from eight months to eight weeks. This is a significant step in the right direction, but one which I recognise needs to be built on.
Poor hygiene and cleanliness
Both your feedback, and the recent CQC inspections, highlighted instances of poor cleanliness on ward areas. For example, the CQC raised an issue in relation to the curtains around beds.
I am grateful for this feedback. This is disappointing. It is something we have responded to the CQC on directly, and have taken direct action to address the points raised during the recent unannounced inspections. Moreover, one of our Heads of Midwifery has been leading a programme of work with our Band 2 and 3 staff focussing on wider responsibilities including ward hygiene, communication, and staff attitude and behaviour.
Lack of kindness and civility
Women and families using our services have a right to expect kindness and civility at all times. I apologise to anyone who has experienced anything less, including anyone who has experienced racism, which is unacceptable in any form.
In your letter, you raise some specific instances of rudeness. I would be happy to receive further details of the case of Mrs M so that this case can be properly investigated.
Your letter makes reference to poor, and sometimes rude, verbal communication. I have asked the Director of Midwifery to make my expectations clear, that all staff at NUH are expected to communicate in a professional and courteous way at all times. I have reminded our Chief Nurse and Medical Director that unacceptable communication of any kind must be dealt with as a professional standards matter. There are clear processes for issues such as this and we must follow them to an appropriate conclusion.
You have highlighted concerns about how we communicate with and involve fathers, particularly when the pregnancy is not straightforward. I am sorry to hear about these concerns. I would like to assure you that we are committed to ensuring that the care of the father and birth partners is an essential part of our maternity care. We have strengthened our approach to this through training and education programmes. One example is the training provided through Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training (PROMPT). There is a designated person to look after the partner and keep them informed of what is going on during emergencies. They escort the partner to theatre, for example, when they need to get changed. We encourage partners to attend postnatal debriefs and birth reflection appointments. Questions from partners are encouraged during any investigation as we recognise the impact that birth trauma can have on them.
More broadly, as part of our People First Strategy, we have launched a new set of Trust values. While I recognise that embedding these will take time, they reflect much clearer messages to all, and we will use them to hold each other to account. Our new values are:
The values link with our newly published Workforce Inclusion Strategy approved by the Trust Board on 11 January 2024 (attached). This Strategy is accompanied by a comprehensive implementation programme.
In my letter dated 22 February 2024, I described some of the work to respond to your earlier feedback about inclusion in maternity. This work continues, alongside the wider work we are progressing through our Community Engagement Team. This team is focussing on fostering connections with local charities and communities in Nottingham to enhance healthcare access and outcomes. The team has prioritised a number of key initiatives, including:
Your letter raises issues about our postnatal care. I am aware that some of our postnatal care requires further attention, as we have too many examples of discharge processes to primary care not being sufficiently robust.
We have undertaken some detailed work in relation to missed postnatal visits, and a report issued earlier this year captured a comprehensive programme of actions, including:
If you are able to share specific examples of problems being reported to you, I would be happy to look into them.
Staff related matters
I am pleased that so many colleagues are taking the opportunity to engage in the staff voices element of your review, and we are grateful for the feedback that it provides.
I recognise the concerns that staff have raised with you. I have apologised publicly to colleagues who felt the need to raise issues directly with you or our regulators. This is concerning and indicates that we must work on how we communicate with staff across maternity. This is an issue that our new Medical Director and Chief Nurse will be addressing. As a means of reassurance, we have a comprehensive programme of support in place, which I have summarised in Appendix A to this letter. It seems, though, that we must do more to make colleagues aware of what is on offer, and to do more to understand the needs of colleagues who are working in a busy service, which is under intense scrutiny.
In relation to staffing, duty rotas and the allocation of shifts can be contentious, but our process includes the check of all ward produced rosters by matrons and the workforce lead.
This ensures that the skill-mix for each shift is appropriate, that flexible working arrangements are honoured, and that there is no obvious imbalance in shift allocation for individuals.
Specifically, I can confirm that:
In relation to Newly Qualified Midwives (NQMs), it is the case that these are the main source of new staff as there is very little movement of experienced staff locally or nationally. Please be assured that we have developed a robust infrastructure to ensure a balance in the workforce between numbers and skillset. As a reflection of the way in which we support new colleagues I can report that all NQMs who have been employed in the last 12 months have remained at NUH.
Features of our support and development mechanism include:
We have completed the Birth-Rate Plus acuity tool as per guidance with escalations and actions, including escalation to the manager on call. The Trust meets the Birth-Rate Plus standards and recruitment is positive with 40 midwives scheduled to join NUH in the coming months. In addition, we have sufficient budget to recruit above Birth Rate Plus, to take into account some of the unique factors which impact on our maternity services. Equally, despite the Trust’s ambitious Financial Sustainability Plan, maternity services are not expected to make specific savings.
All of these measures are supported by the senior leadership team. The team has made efforts to be visible. This includes a daily walk around by matrons and/or Heads of Midwifery, as well as a monthly Heads of Midwifery visit to the community team base. In addition, the Heads of Midwifery and the Director of Midwifery are based within the maternity unit at City Hospital, and there is identified office space for them to spend two days a week at QMC.
Monthly engagement events, open to all maternity and neonatal staff, cover a range of topics, and front line colleagues are encouraged to voice any concerns or raise questions with senior colleagues.
Your letter mentions feedback from internal investigations. NUH has embraced the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF). PSIRF focusses on systems and processes, rather than individual fault. PSIRF emphasises a just and restorative culture framework used for responses to incidents (including HR related matters). Support is in place following incidents, for example hot debriefs, Professional Midwife Advocates (PMA), Quality Review Service (QRS) support, and Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) review of incidents (which has a learning focus).
Colleagues affected by incidents are supported through education, learning and reflection and through restorative practice models. In addition, we have improved support from our Legal Services for colleagues who are called to the Coroner’s Court.
Lastly, your letter mentions resourcing of community clinics. A community midwifery review is under way to consider estates issues, connectivity, team numbers, activity and caseloads, as well as administrative support. Rest assured, that administrative support to these teams has remained in place, pending the outcome of the review.
In summary, I hope that this response reassures you that we take your feedback seriously and that we have acted upon it. At the same time, I hope you can see that our Maternity Improvement Programme remains a high priority for the Trust, as does your review and responding to any findings from the CQC.
I look forward to continuing our work together in the coming months.
Yours sincerely
Anthony May OBE DL
Chief Executive
Donna Ockenden Ltd. First Floor, 31 North Street, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1LX
VAT No: 168 5906 65 - Registered in England & Wales - Company No: 8604834
Registered Office: 3 Lion Street, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1LW
1 July 2024
By email only:
Mr Anthony May OBE DL
Chief Executive
Nottingham Hospitals NHS Trust
Trust Headquarters
City Hospital Campus
Hucknall Road
Nottingham
NG5 1PB
Dear Anthony,
We have agreed that we will tell you about the issues that are coming up in the course of the Review's work on an ongoing basis, rather than wait until we have investigated fully and are able to publish our analysis in our final Report. The information in this letter therefore remains to be fully investigated by the Review and is as reported to us by families and NUH staff communicating with the Review. I sincerely hope that this timely sharing of information will significantly assist the Trust in its ongoing maternity improvement journey.
Following on from the from the Learning and Improvement meeting of 22nd May 2024 at the Trust, and my many recent visits and meetings with local families and current and former NUH staff as agreed, I am writing to formally record the issues and concerns that have recently been discussed with me.
In between Learning and Improvement meetings there is ongoing and regular contact between my team, myself and Trust colleagues. This is important as part of the Trust maternity improvement journey. I am grateful for the Trust’s engagement with the Review team and particularly with Tracy Pilcher, the Chief Nurse and yourself.
In the last month I have met with many hundreds of local families; individual and face to face meetings have continued, plus the Review Team hosted a family ‘Get Together’ attended by over 200 Review families. Last Sunday I also attended 4 church services with large congregations hosted by the Majority Black Led Churches, (MBLC) across Nottingham. In the last month I visited both City and Queens Hospitals early in the morning to informally meet maternity and neonatal teams ‘on the ground’ and to encourage them to join in with the Review’s ‘staff voices’ initiative if they have not already done so.
As at today and since formal records began in June 2023 I have referred more than 70 families to Tracy and yourself where families have specifically asked that concerns they have should be shared directly with you as CEO. These are situations causing distress to families in the ‘here and now’ and need to be considered by the Trust without delay. Essentially they are not concerns that should or could wait for the completion of the Review and publication of our final report. Unfortunately, a number of these cases are re- referrals where the Trust had told the Review team that the case was closed but the family have disagreed and asked me to advocate for them in this regard. A number of the concerns outlined in this letter are of very recent occurrence.
The concerns for the urgent attention of you and / or the senior leadership team at NUH include the following:
Governance:
1. Families are regularly reporting to me (and we are seeing evidence of) a significant delay in response to requests for medical records, delay in complaint responses, poor quality complaint responses, and continuing uncertainty as to whether an investigation was instigated as it should have been at the time of the incident. The delays in receipt of medical records following request to the Trust was a very significant concern raised by numerous families at the ‘Family Get Together’ on Saturday 15th June.
2. Families have also raised with me the very difficult process for submitting the documentation requesting their own records. I have briefly reviewed the document. I am unsure if this is used NHS wide or it is specific to NUH? It appears to ask some rather intrusive questions and would not be easily accessible to families without an advanced level of education. I am aware of families having to help each other to fill in the request form where families are distressed at not understanding what they need to do. This is causing limited access to medical records for those families who are isolated and do not have access to other families to help them.
3. We are both aware of horrible internal emails that have been written about families by Trust employees in recent years and subsequently sent to families in response to ‘Subject Access Requests’ made by families in the last few months. These are internal emails between Trust employees specifically mentioning families in the last few years. I am not suggesting for one moment that these emails should not have been provided to families by the Trust in response to a subject access request, but observe that they should not have been written about families by NUH staff in the first place. I hope that appropriate standards of email behaviour and etiquette can now be swiftly introduced and monitored within the Trust.
4. We both agree that it is important that the Trust ensures maternity governance teams (and any other teams) needing to investigate clinical or family concerns or provide records to families are appropriately resourced to ensure that these concerns are looked into and responded to as required in an appropriate timeframe. This is still not happening consistently and is compounding the grief and distress families experience after traumatic events at the Trust.
Follow up of cases referred to the Trust:
5. We are both aware of a number of cases referred to the Trust by me/ my review team that now need re escalation to you/ your team because the required actions have not been undertaken by the Trust. There appears to be a discrepancy in some cases where according to the Trust mothers have stated they did not want follow up appointments for birth injuries etc. even where there were complications significantly affecting the daily lives of mothers such as incontinence. Some mothers have said this is not true, with one who described to me being shouted at by a Trust employee on the telephone. ‘Do you want this appointment or not? YES or NO? One word, is all I need!’ (Trust employee to mother) The Trust employee was asked to ‘slow down’ so that the mother could explain that English was not her first language and allegedly the Trust employee (unidentified) put the phone down and recorded that the mother did not want the appointment.
6. In another case needing ongoing follow up for post birth care the psychological support service have had to highlight to the Review team an extremely long wait for maternal treatment of a year despite the case originating in the death of a baby at the Trust. This case has been referred to the Chief Nurse and yourself; I hope this can be swiftly resolved by the Trust so that the mother has the treatment she needs very soon.
Poor hygiene and cleanliness in the Trust negatively impacting on patient experience.
7. We are both aware of very significant concerns regarding hygiene and cleanliness that have been raised many times over the last few months. The examples within this letter are of recent origin, although lack of cleanliness also features in many cases throughout the timespan of the review suggesting it is possibly a chronic (and to date), unresolved issue at the Trust.
8. Recently Mr and Mrs R who sadly lost their baby in the spring of 2024 described an allegedly clean room where the bed had clearly been slept in (and smelled really stale), the toilet was soiled with faeces and a blood stained rag was found in the pull out chair.
9. Mr and Mrs V have also raised very significant concerns regarding the cleanliness of a number of clinical areas and lack of standard infection prevention processes across the Trust. This included a member of medical staff using a clinical waste bin lid as a sterile field instead of an appropriately prepared trolley for a highly invasive procedure. Mr and Mrs V shared further concerns with a soiled bed said to be clean, (I saw the photographs) and what appears to be insects in the bed and throughout the room. (These experiences as described by the R and V families were 2022 to 2024 and included gynaecology, maternity and neonatal units.)
10. You will recall that this is not the first time I have raised cleanliness of clinical areas and indeed a caller raised this with you ‘on air’ when we spoke on Kemet FM radio station recently.
Lack of kindness and civility; racism and discrimination.
11. As we are both aware these issues have been a longstanding theme throughout all of our conversations and communication since September 2022. It continues. We are aware of, and the Trust is investigating, some cruel and callous communication with a recently bereaved mother. Another mother with a 9 month old baby, Mrs M has told me that having had 3 babies in 5 years at City Hospital she feels there is a deteriorating level of civility at City Hospital. Mrs M believes that racism played a part in the way she was treated recently. She buzzed for help but was routinely ignored, staff would look up but ignore her. She reports that if staff did come to speak to her they would be rude, dismissive and tell her off. Other families are also reporting unkindness and rudeness which is believed to be linked to racism.
12. A mother who wishes to remain anonymous, (the Review team knows who she is) told us of support workers shouting at mothers and telling them off. There are a number of mothers now raising this concern. Mrs Anonymous was shouted at in front of other patients: ’What do you think you are doing? Stop that noise!’ Mrs Anonymous was rocking her baby in the cot as she was unable to pick the baby up post caesarean section.
13. Fathers and partners have reported significant distress at sometimes not being informed when mothers are experiencing complex deliveries; interventions were frequently not explained; and partners report being left alone with no information for long periods.
14. Postnatal care in the community appears to be poor in those cases where additional support has been necessary. Families report that staff appear to be under significant pressure with insufficient staffing for the workload they have. Many families are sympathetic to staff and comment on how very many of them are doing their best with the staffing available.
15. The Review Team hear multiple reports of poor signposting and access to professional psychological support following birth trauma which the Review team is now working with FPSS to resolve.
Staff voices:
16. I am pleased to confirm that more than 750 staff have now come forward to the Review’s staff voices initiative. Many staff are reporting significant distress at the working conditions within maternity services at the Trust. These predate the review and some distress exists to the current time. Recent issues reported by staff include the following:
My sense is that I am now hearing a growing level of concerns from family and staff meetings rather than a reduction, and many of the families I have met recently or have contacted me to meet report concerns that are of recent origin. Similarly staff concerns are frequently of very recent origin or very much ‘in the here and now.’
I trust that my letter is helpful in ensuring that the Trust’s perinatal services continue on their improvement journey.
Donna Ockenden
Chair
The Maternity Review
Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS Trust
Donna Ockenden Ltd
Our Ref: AM/co
Chief Executive’s Office
Trust Headquarters
City Hospital campus
Hucknall Road
Nottingham
NG5 1PB
Tel: 0115 840 4807
Email: anthony.may@nuh.nhs.uka
www.nuh.nhs.uk
22 February 2024
Donna Ockenden
By Email: donnaockenden@donnaockenden.com
Dear Donna,
Thank you for your letter, dated 19 December 2023, and for the feedback it contains. This regular feedback is valuable in assisting our ongoing efforts to improve our Maternity Services. Thank you also for recognising the significant amount of work undertaken in our Maternity Service and for highlighting the provision at the Mary Potter Centre. Your feedback identifies areas where we must do better. Aspects of your letter make for difficult reading. Whilst it is disappointing to learn of the experiences which have been shared with you, I want to assure you that we are learning from the feedback. On behalf of the Trust, I want to apologise to these women and families for any shortcomings.
We know we have much more to do and we are focussed on improving our services. In modern Nottingham and Nottinghamshire, an important feature of quality is cultural sensitivity and inclusion. I want all our services to be inclusive and I want all of our patients and their families to engage with our services safe in the knowledge that they are open to them at all levels and free of discrimination. I hope that this letter shows our determination to address these issues as quickly as we can.
1. Translation and Interpretation service provision - You highlight that Roma women have raised lack of, or poor interpreting and translation services, including access to female translators during appointments, hospital care, clinical procedures, decision making and consent.
The Trust is committed to ongoing engagement across the communities we serve. We want to learn from our service users’ experiences and have recently appointed an Inclusion Fellow to lead the work, and to meet with targeted community groups.
Our Inclusive Maternity Working Group is working with the Trust’s Inclusion Team to develop five key actions. These are outlined within the Trust’s Workforce Inclusion Strategy, which was approved at our January 2024 Board meeting. The areas of focus are as follows:
The priorities for improvement have been identified through listening to service users. This includes community events for women from ethnic minority backgrounds, and through a questionnaire. Our Workforce Inclusion Strategy is overseen by our new Director of Inclusion. The strategy has a clear governance structure to ensure senior oversight, leadership, escalation, assurance and support. This structure is included in the appendix to this letter.
The feedback from the Roma women’s experiences has been shared with the Trust’s Inclusion Team, Maternity Leadership Team and the Trust Interpreter and Translation Services Lead.
The following actions are being taken to address these issues:
2. Support for the Inclusive Maternity Senior Leadership Roles to challenge behaviours and culture.
You have met the Inclusive Maternity Team, which is leading our work to improve inclusion in Maternity Services. This initiative is a high priority for the organisation and has my personal support, as well as that of the Chairman of the Trust, Nick Carver. The team is working with the Trust’s Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Team and our Chief Nurse. The Team reports directly to the Director of Midwifery and is supported by the Maternity Improvement Programme Board and the Family Health Divisional Leadership Team.
3. Reports of racist and discriminatory behaviour throughout our Maternity Services highlighted in the examples you provided.
I am disappointed to hear that women and families have experienced discriminatory behaviour. This is contrary to our values and beliefs, and I take it very seriously. I would be grateful if you could encourage the women and families concerned to contact our Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) Team (via pals@nuh.nhs.uk) to enable us to investigate the incidents thoroughly and take any appropriate action.
From January 2023 the Maternity Service implemented a two-day cultural competency training course. This training explores assumptions around culture and encourages leaders to understand the importance of inclusion.
The Maternity Service delivers obstetric emergency training (PROMPT) to multi-professional groups. This includes a “psychological safety” workshop to create an open dialogue and to explore concerns about, and raise awareness of, inclusion culture and safety.
The Maternity Service introduced the Integrated Maternity Personalised Annual Care Training study days from January 2023. This is for all midwives and support workers. The training is based around case studies and raises awareness of the different cultures and individual holistic and spiritual needs. This training will be completed by 90% of midwives by July 2024. The learning outcomes are based on Core Competency Framework Version 2 (NHS England, 2023).
The training explores situational awareness and how we accommodate different faith needs. Furthermore, plans are in place to incorporate cultural awareness into the multidisciplinary study days. The training will be evaluated and reviewed in the summer. Any changes will be incorporated before the training is relaunched in September 2024.
Engagement sessions are being planned with sonographers across the Service. The aim of these sessions is to use data to identify ways to highlight the importance of scanning and to improve services for communities which do not engage well with the service.
One outcome of the sessions will enable us to provide a service that can allow children to attend with the woman / birthing partner, and to raise awareness of cultural sensitivity and nuances amongst these communities. We hope this will support better engagement, patient experience and attendance to appointments. The aim is to improve outcomes for communities, where engagement might be hampered by lack of childcare.
4. Behaviour of staff, highlighted by the example given; comments regarding the use of mobile phones by staff; and mothers not being listened to.
Thank you for sharing the concerns raised by a specific service user regarding the behaviours of postnatal Maternity staff. It is upsetting to hear that women and families have reported being subjected to this behaviour. I have arranged for a formal apology to be sent to the family.
The use of telephones is common practice and essential to staff being able to care for women. For example, everyone has a hand held device or telephone to input into Nervecentre, the electronic observation and handover tool. You have identified that this is not clearly understood or communicated to patients and families. This will be addressed with teams.
A golden thread through maternity training is communication and the importance of listening and responding to concerns with compassion. Last year, for example, this was included in the training to 200 midwives within the resuscitation training day. Understandably, you have raised a complaint on a service user’s behalf, which we take very seriously. I have asked the Complaints Team to initiate an investigation through the formal complaint process, subject to the consent of the complainant.
5. Long lengths of time elapsing from concerns raised and the response by the Trust. Resources to support teams to ensure timely investigations and responses.
I extend my apologies to families experiencing long delays as a result of raising concerns. We are committed to addressing issues identified from feedback and incidents so as to prevent harm and distress. We have established a clear framework for resolving complaints and concerns which you are referring to me. In addition, we have put in place sufficient resource and mechanisms to manage these referrals. That said, it has been challenging to identify suitably skilled and experienced external capacity to undertake this work.
To address the case highlighted within your letter, senior colleagues from the Maternity Service have been in contact with the family and a Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) birth debrief took place in December 2023.
Our Maternity Patient Experience Matron is undertaking a thematic review of the birth reflection and MDT birth debrief service. This will include a review of waiting list times and resources for discussion at the Independent Maternity Review panel.
When we receive concerns from women and families, we make initial contact with them to agree expectations, time frames and mode of communication. Our aim is to keep in contact while we undertake further investigation. The recently established Maternity Review Process Panel is currently reviewing how we measure and evaluate whether we are meeting the needs of women and families. This work is overseen by The Independent Maternity Review Oversight Group, which I chair.
Thank you again for your continued feedback and for engaging with us on our improvement journey.
Yours sincerely
Anthony May OBE DL
Chief Executive
First Floor, 31 North Street, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1LX
19 December 2023
By email only:
Mr Anthony May OBE DL
Chief Executive
Nottingham Hospitals NHS Trust
Trust Headquarters
City Hospital Campus
Hucknall Road
Nottingham
NG5 1PB
Dear Anthony,
Further to my attendance at the Learning and Improvement meetings of 31st August and 14th November 2023 at the Trust, as agreed, I am writing to record the issues raised and discussed at the meetings and our subsequent conversations. I recognise that a significant amount of contact between yourself, myself and Michelle Rhodes as Chief Nurse occurs in between these meetings. I also know that a significant amount of work is put into responding to the issues I raise at and in between these meetings and that families raising concerns do receive responses and some support. Please extend my thanks to everyone who is involved in the ongoing journey of maternity improvement at the Trust. Of note, service users continue to praise the efforts of community maternity staff at the Mary Potter Centre; particularly in their efforts to advocate for them in often very complex situations.
As of today and since June of this year I have referred 35 families to you where families have specifically asked that concerns they have should be shared directly with you as CEO. What has happened to these families covers the full timeframe of the review from 2010 but with a number of the concerns raised being of very recent occurrence.
The issues I raised at the last Learning and Improvement meeting and our conversations/ contact since include the following:
We have discussed the work of the Inclusivity Maternity Taskforce, (IMT) set up since the April 2023 Learning and Improvement Meeting. Whilst I look forward to hearing of further progress from their work I raised concerns that the leaders of this work must have the support, influencing skills and ‘seniority’ to deal with what now appears to be a long term and very entrenched problem of discrimination and lack of inclusion in the delivery of maternity care at the Trust. I am pleased that this work is being supported and led personally by you as CEO, Nick Carver, Chair and the Board. You have explained to me that your support will extend beyond maternity to early pregnancy care and in all likelihood beyond women’s health to other areas of the Trust. We agree it is essential, that the IMT must have the resource and support to deliver upon a very challenging agenda across the Trust.
We have also discussed the resources made available to clinical and governance teams to ensure appropriate and timely enquiry into and investigation of clinical incidents and concerns raised by families. The case above of Mr and Mrs S who have waited a year to receive information on the case of their baby is not the only case we have discussed. We have agreed it is important that the Trust ensures maternity (and any other teams) needing to investigate clinical or family concerns are appropriately resourced to ensure that these concerns are looked into and responded to in an appropriate timeframe. We both agree that families should not have to repeatedly follow up with the Trust, searching for answers which only compounds the distress they are, in all likelihood already experiencing.
Yours sincerely,
Donna Ockenden
Copy:
Duncan Burton, Deputy CNO, NHS England, Chair, Learning and Improvement Meeting
September 2023
We have responded to Donna Ockenden’s letters of April and August 2023 to outline positive action taken against the feedback that has been provided to the Trust. You can read the full response from Anthony May our Chief Executive in the letter below:
Dear Donna,
Re: Independent Maternity Review – Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Thank you for meeting with us on 14 April and 21 June, and for your subsequent follow up letters dated 20 April, and 8 August 2023. In our most recent meeting, we promised that we would formally write to outline how we have responded to the points you raised in the two letters above, both of which are published on our website (20 April 2023, and 8 August 2023). The responses below also reflect the verbal feedback provided by Michelle Rhodes our Chief Nurse in our meeting on Thursday 31 August.
As always, we welcome the opportunity to hear your feedback on a regular basis, as it allows us to take action. We also are pleased to have been able to use the meetings to update you verbally on the work of the Maternity Improvement Programme at NUH, including on some of the feedback detailed below.
Points addressed in the correspondence dated 20 April 2023
You expressed to us that the feedback you had received from local Black and Asian women was that mistrust of the Trust has deepened and that our communication and relationships with them have progressively worsened. This included language and communication’ failures with women saying they did not feel heard or seen:
• Concerns from maternity staff of a proposal to reduce Urdu language appointments accompanied by an interpreter from 30 minutes to 20 minutes.
• That women had raised with you a lack of interpreting services within the Trust leading to women for whom English is not their spoken language having to make decisions without informed consent.
• A lack of translated written materials into languages such as Urdu, which was leading impacted women’s ability to make informed choices about their care.
In the letter, you also described ‘a failure to appreciate cultural sensitivities’ including occasions when a female sonographer has not been available for the care of Muslim women who had requested one.
We have thanked you for this important feedback and taken significant action since the meeting on 14 April to address the issues identified. Colleagues in our Transformation team presented some of the activity to you in our subsequent meetings on 21 June and 31 August. Progress made since April includes:
• A new taskforce of midwives, doctors, researchers, advocates and representatives from Black, Asian and minority ethnic staff and families has been immediately established.
• The proposed change to the length of appointments was not introduced.
• Information on the maternity pages of our website is accessible and available in different languages.
• Letters inviting women for scans now include the choice of a female sonographer if preferred.
• Forthcoming events in the service with a focus on inclusion include a ‘Who’s Shoes’ learning event aimed at black and ethnic minority service users in maternity, and a Maternity Staff Summit in October as a celebration of Black History Month.
• Our lead midwives are representatives on the local LMNS Maternity Interpreting Services working group.
• We are piloting a 24-hour Languages on Demand Video Interpreting service in our labour suites from 11 September 2023, which will allow live consultations or pre-booked appointments. This service includes Urdu as one of the languages.
Points addressed in the correspondence dated 8 August 2023
You told us that women told you they were still told to ‘break their fast’ for some blood tests without flexibility for early or later blood tests during the month of Ramadan.
This feedback has been shared with our anti-natal services Matron, and various actions are being taken to address the issue, including; engagement with a local Muslim women’s group for education and awareness; a date has been set for January 2024 in order for us to raise awareness with staff and to plan proactive communication with women on this issue; and we are planning a visit to Bradford’s anti-natal services to learn from their approach.
You shared with us feedback that women you had spoken to had repeatedly told they are not in labour ‘it’s Braxton Hicks’, when contacting the unit, and that other women are told they could not be in labour and to stay at home ‘if they can ‘talk on the phone.’ You identified a theme of women not being believed that they were in labour.
This information has been shared with the matron and managers for Maternity and Labour (MAL) and has been added to the agenda for the next MAL team meeting for further discussion and awareness. We are improving our communications channels within the service for sharing learning and feedback such as this, including a new MAL email list including CMW, NHSP and triage staff, as well as a new learning whiteboard for Maternity and Labour. We are also working to separate the latent phase of labour guideline for staff from the overall intrapartum guideline to make it easier of staff to access the right information. We have also checked our complaints records for any additional intelligence or learning, although it has not been identified as a theme in our records.
You identified “repeated examples of manual removal of placentas’ being undertaken without appropriate anaesthesia in a labour ward room rather than in a theatre, often with only gas and air.” Our maternity guideline sets out that manual removal of placentas should be undertaken in theatre with consent and adequate analgesia. We have reviewed all of these procedures which have been recorded on Badgernet since the beginning of 2023, and 97.5% comply with the guidance.
The cases that were not managed in accordance with guidance are being managed as incidents to understand what happened and to identify opportunities for learning.
Parents had fed back to you that the maternity team were using genetic testing as a ‘first line’ of enquiry, before any governance investigation or enquiry following a baby being born in unexpectedly poor condition.
We have investigated this feedback to better understand any underlying concerns. For diagnosis of Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), we follow standard criteria which are established nationally, and are in our neonatal HIE guidelines.
Genetic testing is not done routinely at NUH, and where there is clinical rationale to follow a HIE test, it must be discussed with the parents first. Genetic testing is only carried out in circumstances where the clinical presentation doesn’t quite fit and there is a possibility of other factors (family history for example), or no discernible underlying cause for hypoxia. Of more than 200 referrals for R14, there are only two instances where HIE is mentioned, and if a baby was referred for testing with just HIE, the guidance if for the test to be rejected.
R14 genetic tests are only carried out under the direction of the genetics expertise.
Parents reported to you that they had been told by the maternity team that their notes had been ‘lost’ by the Trust but the Review team have them (electronically) meaning they cannot be lost.
We have requested more specific information on these cases so that we can review and respond on the individuals involved.
We hope that the above responses given you assurance that we are taking the feedback that we receive from your team, mothers, and our colleagues seriously, and that we remain committed to taking action to resolve issues where they are identified.
You will also be aware that since we met, the CQC have published their latest reports for NUH, which has upgraded maternity services at City Hospitals and Queen’s Medical Centre to Requires Improvement from Inadequate. We know that we have improvements to make but are pleased that the regulator has recognised the progress that has bene made so far.
In their report, the CQC found that “Staff in both maternity services were kind and understood the personal, cultural, religious, and social needs of each person and showed understanding and a non-judgmental attitude when caring for or discussing people with mental health needs.”
Nottingham University Hospitals remains fully committed to the Independent Maternity Review, and we look forward to meeting with you again shortly.
Yours sincerely
Anthony May OBE DL
Chief Executive
During their inspection, the CQC saw a number of improvements in areas where concerns had previously been raised:
Previously, women had not been listened to regarding their care in maternity. At this inspection, the CQC observed staff who were skilled in communicating with women and their families. They found that all the interactions between staff, women and their families were caring, positive and informative. Women were listened to and involved in their care. During their inspection, the CQC noted that women gave ‘overwhelmingly positive’ feedback about the service and results from the latest national maternity survey showed that women giving birth in 2022 had a better experience that when giving birth in 2021. Feedback from women and families in the Friends and Family Test (June 2023) shows that 96% of respondents rate their experience as good or very good.
Significant improvements were seen in the triage unit and day assessment unit. This is described by the CQC as a ‘key achievement’ since the last inspection with 96% of all pregnant women being seen within 15 minutes of arrival in the triage unit. Staff especially demonstrated kindness towards the women attending and worked to make sure women did not stay longer than they needed to. Cardiotocography (CTG) monitoring for women, which was previously an area of concern, was now completed appropriately and was documented in line with national guidance. Staff said they felt confident in reviewing the traces and escalating when required.
Staffing concerns had improved with the CQC noting that maternity services provided enough staff with the right qualifications, skills, training and experience to keep women safe from avoidable harm and to provide the right care and treatment. They also found that managers regularly reviewed and adjusted staffing levels and skill mix. The CQC noted the focus on recruiting and retaining midwives, including the introduction of retention lead to oversee recruitment and retention. This included plans to improve staffing levels through a number of schemes, including international recruitment, return to practice, advanced clinical practice, and an increase in student midwifery university placements.
At the last well-led inspection, the CQC had concerns around the values and behaviours of some of the leadership of the Trust. During this inspection, the CQC noted that the executive team consistently led with integrity and were open and honest in their approach. Some staff still didn’t always feel able to raise concerns without fear of retribution, but leaders at the Trust were aware of this and were working to create a workplace that is free from bullying, harassment, racism, and discrimination. The CQC witnessed examples of where appropriate learning and action had been taken because of concerns raised. CQC inspectors found that most staff felt positive and proud to work in the organisation.
The CQC identified areas where the Trust needs to focus on to improve further, including:
The Trust must improve processes around Duty of Candour with patients to inform them of incidents
Following appropriate guidance in the proper and safe storage and administration of medicines
Ensuring that expressed breast milk is stored safely and in line with national guidance.
We must improve to make sure staff consistently carry out risk assessments to keep women, their babies and staff safe from potential abuse. In addition, all staff need to receive mandatory training to enable them to recognise and report abuse to protect women and babies.
The trust should ensure arrangements for identifying risks, issues and mitigating actions are embedded
We should continue to strengthen a culture where staff have a voice that counts and is valued by leaders and managers by consistently tackling behaviour and actions in a timely way to aid learning and improvement.
In addition to the findings from the CQC report, there is a whole host of work and improvements taking place across our services. We have established a dedicated Maternity Oversight Committee to scrutinise our Maternity Improvement Plan and provide regular reports to our Board, to provide the public with an opportunity to track our progress.
Alongside this, we are working with Donna Ockenden in support of her independent review of our maternity services, and Nottinghamshire Police, and have committed to an honest and transparent relationship with the families whose lives have been affected by our maternity failings.
*Continued focus on recruitment and retention, including recruiting internationally for roles including midwives, doctors and support roles.
In September 2022, Donna Ockenden began her independent review of maternity services at our hospitals.
As part of the review process, Donna and her team share key findings with us and NHS England on a regular basis. This feedback supports the continuous learning and improvement of maternity care at NUH and is included into our existing Maternity Improvement Programme.
At the most recent meeting held on 21 June 2023, Donna and her team met with Chief Executive Anthony May, Chief Nurse Michelle Rhodes and Medical Director Dr Keith Girling where she provided feedback from meetings that she is continuing to hold with mothers and families taking part in the review.
We are committed to sharing that feedback in an open and transparent way as we continue to learn and improve.
In the meeting, Donna fed back about the positive experience of one mother who explained how one of our midwives had ‘turned her life around’ using her knowledge and support to advocate for the mother through some very complex circumstances. Feedback included:
We were also able to present Donna and the Review team with an update from our Inclusivity Maternity Taskforce which has been set up in response previous feedback around how we engage with black and ethnic minority services users and is working to improve our services in this area.
Donna also fed back on areas that we need to continue improving:
Donna followed up in writing with a letter addressed to Chief Executive Anthony May on 8 August. You can read the letter here - Letter Donna Ockenden to Chief Executive (8th Aug 2023)[pdf] 547KB
Michelle Rhodes, Chief Nurse, said: “We are grateful for the continued and regular feedback on our services from Donna Ockenden. The format of the meetings enables us to act swiftly on the information we are given to improve services for our women and families rather than waiting for the publication of the review to act.
“We know that more work needs to be done in a number of areas and we are taking forward the most recent feedback from Donna alongside the continuing Maternity Improvement Programme.
“Our teams are absolutely committed to improving services, and we are proud that the work of the taskforce was recognised for making progress in a number of areas with black and minority ethnic groups, as well as the important work midwives are leading with the homeless and asylum seekers. It is also gratifying and humbling to hear the individual testimony of the difference one of our midwives made with a mother, which is the level of care that we all should aspire to.
“Women and families can be assured that the feedback and learning that is shared with us throughout the review is used to make improvements to our maternity services immediately.”
Further information about the review can be found here.
Scope of the Independent Review
Since the most recent meeting with Donna Ockenden it has been agreed that the terms of reference for the Independent Maternity Review are changing to an ‘opt out’ basis for women and families identified as being within scope rather than the previous ‘opt in’ arrangement. This means that women and families will automatically be included in the review unless they contact the review team to say no; previously it was the other way around.
As the subject of the review, this was not our decision to make, but one that NHS England as the commissioners have taken. This will mean that more people will take part in the Review, and may change the timescales involved.
We know how important this review is for the families, our staff and all our communities and we will continue to work with NHS England and the independent review team to ensure that everyone who wants to can share their experiences and have their say.”
In September 2022, Donna Ockenden began her independent review of maternity services at our hospitals.
As part of the review process, Donna and her team share key findings with us and NHS England on a quarterly basis. This feedback supports the continuous learning and improvement of maternity care at NUH and is included into our existing maternity improvement programme.
At a meeting held on 14 April, Donna and her team met with Chief Executive Anthony May, Chief Nurse Michelle Rhodes and Medical Director Dr Keith Girling, where she provided feedback that:
Donna followed up in writing with a letter addressed to Chief Executive Anthony May on 20 April. You can read the letter here - Letter to Anthony May. 372KB
Michelle Rhodes, Chief Nurse, said: “We know more must be done to ensure the voices of women from all the communities we serve are heard, and we welcome feedback from Donna Ockenden and her team.
“Women and families can be assured that the feedback and learning that is shared with us throughout the review is used to make improvements to our maternity services immediately.”
A new taskforce of midwives, doctors, researchers, advocates and representatives from Black, Asian and minority ethnic staff and families is working to immediately address areas highlighted by Donna Ockenden to ensure equality of opportunities, and inclusive and responsive services for all women and families. This includes:
Michelle added: “We want to reassure women and families using our services that the teams caring for them are totally committed to providing the safest and best experience possible and are available to answer any questions they might have.
“We continue to encourage people who have significant or serious concerns about their maternity care to contact the review team. We are also encouraging current and former staff who work directly in or closely with our maternity services, to come forward and engage with the review.”
Further information about the review can be found here.
Dear families,
We have been working hard to make improvements across our maternity services. With the help of your feedback, support from colleagues across healthcare, local councillors and MPs, and of course the dedication of our staff, we have made a number of improvements.
At the start of March 2022 we welcomed inspectors from our regulators – the Care Quality Commission (CQC) – back into our services, and they published their report which can be read here. They have noted a number of these improvements, however, they also picked up on areas of concern.
We realise this may be hard for you to see if you are planning to have your baby in our care, and it is certainly disappointing for our staff. We know that real improvement takes time. We are committed to improving the pace at which we make the changes needed, while ensuring that any improvements are sustainable.
One of the biggest challenges we face is staffing. Like our neighbouring hospitals, the national shortage of midwives is having a particular impact. We want to reassure you that we are making every effort to recruit as many midwives, doctors and support staff to our team as we can.
However, your safety and our ability to provide high quality care are our top priorities so we cannot wait for additional staff before we make changes. So, we are also thinking about how we do things differently to keep you and your families as safe as possible in our care. For example, you may see nurses in our postnatal areas to help support your recovery after labour. We are offering apprenticeships to our maternity support workers, to enhance the skills they hold to help care for our families, and we may reduce the capacity of our wards to ensure those in our care have the support they need.
Another big change, which we’ve made since the CQC inspection, was to separate our day assessment and triage areas in our hospital. We’re pleased to say that now when you come into our hospitals because of a concern you will not be seen alongside those with routine appointments.
Inspectors rated our caring as ‘good’ and they told us that we also provide good treatment. They highlighted improvements in our management of safety incidents, and said we were focused on the needs of women and families receiving care.
They also highlighted some areas they deemed to be outstanding, saying our specialist midwives went above and beyond for the women they cared for, and some of our scenario training to learn from incidents was also outstanding.
Keeping patients safe and providing high quality care are our top priorities, and we are increasing the pace with which we address the concerns in this report.
We are proud of our teams for the improvements they have put in place, but we realise we have more to do and we are committed to continuing to work with local families and healthcare partners to make the changes required.
You can read the full report on the Care Quality Commission website
If you have any concerns or questions please speak to your midwife.
Best wishes,
Sharon Wallis, Director of Midwifery.
Maternity Triage Opened April 2022
In April 2022, our Triage Service became a stand alone service providing emergency care in pregnancy. We aim to see women within 15 minutes of arrival and since April over 90% of our women and families are seen in triage within 15 minutes.
Maternity Advice Line
In response to your feedback, we now have a team of midwives providing support for you when you need it, 24 hours a day, every day of the year. If you have any concerns during your pregnancy or after baby arrives, you can now talk to our friendly midwives on 0115 9709777.
BadgerNotes rolled out
Parents-to-be across Nottinghamshire can access their pregnancy notes online via an app called Badger Notes.
The move will provide families with greater access to their pregnancy records and information via their smart phone, PC or tablet, at any time of the day or night. The new digital record system has a whole host of features, enabling people to view extracts of information from their pregnancy record in real time and log key pregnancy events. Read more here.
2020